The company dashed a bit of cold water on those hopes when it reminded us that the goal of this experiment is to “reach a total of at least 50,000 and potentially up to 500,000 people with this experiment.”

But what city/cities should really win Google’s broadband challenge?

Greenville, SC Creates Google Logo With More Than 2,000 People Holding LED Glow Sticks; Photo by Michael Bergen, AidJoy.org

Should it be the city with the best ability to garner national news coverage, whether that’s Topeka, KS (renamed “Google, KS” for the month of March); Duluth, MN (tongue-in-cheek response to Topeka edict to name firstborn children “Google and Googlette Fiber”); or Greenville, SC (citizen-powered LED-logo)? Should it be a city from California? (There are at least 15 cities reportedly in the running.) Should it be a non-urban area? (Google says it wants to offer high-speed fiber to at least 50,000 people.)

This map (effective 1.30 pm PT) shows where responses were concentrated. Each small dot represents a government response; each large dot represents locations where more than 1,000 residents submitted a nomination.

If Google has preconceived ideas about what the winner might look like, they aren’t sharing. Me, I’m hoping that at least one community is on the “bottom” of this population threshold. I’d also like it to be outside of or on the edge of a major metropolitan area.

That means “no” to San Francisco (and other Silicon Valley entities, population density 17,323/sq mi) and Seattle (ditto, 7,136/sq mi). It means “no” to Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Detroit, Las Vegas, Orlando, Philadelphia, Portland, Raleigh, St. Louis. It means “no” to Greensboro (home to seven major colleges and universities) and Madison (center of MSA, population 561,505, and home to University of Wisconsin) and Fairfax County VA (suburban DC) and Sante Fe (the capitol of New Mexico).

I’m arguing for true experimentation: pick at least one locality that the telecos and cable companies are unlikely to care about. It might be an aging industrial center like Huntington, WV (population 49,185 in 2008, 3,234.1/sq mi) or Troy, NY (population 49,170 in 2000, 4,470/sq mi).

My native east coast side is rooting for Troy, even though it is part of a large MSA. Troy has a history of innovation. It’s the home of the Emma Willard School, founded in 1821 as the Troy Female Seminary and “the first school in the country to provide girls the same educational opportunities given to boys.” It’s the home to one of the nation’s first and largest waterwheels, producing electricity for Burden Iron Works and helping jumpstart the industrial revolution (Chapter 1, The Big Switch by Nicolas Carr). And the Google project has brought the community together.

However, for true experimentation, Google should pair a western outpost like Butte, MT (population 33,892 in 2000, 28.9/sq mi) with an agricultural one like Clinton, IA (population 27,772 in 2000, 780.9/sq mi). It is in rural areas that the need for experimentation is the greatest, because for-profit telecos and cable companies won’t be interested in the low density population areas, if 20th century electrification and telephony (REA, NTC) are our guide.

The Google project couldn’t be more timely. Verizon, which has introduced fiber optic cable in 16 states, is divesting itself of the service in the west and mid-west (subject to federal government approval). And Verizon “is the only major U.S. phone company to draw fiber all the way to homes.” While FiOS speeds pale next to speeds in Japan and South Korea, it is the fastest internet-to-the-home in the U.S. Fiber is 4-5 times faster than basic cable and almost 20 times faster than DSL.

According to the Washington Post, at the end of 2009 “Verizon had 2.86 million FiOS TV subscribers and 3.43 million FiOS Internet subscribers (most households take both).” What did it cost to get those customers? In 2007, Verizon estimated a cost of $23 billion over a six year period. Do the math: that’s more than $6,500 per customer, assuming 3.5 million total customers.

Changing out copper for fiber is expensive, but the Google fiber initiative suggests that millions of us understand why it needs to be done.

How do you think Google should make its pick? How much would you pay for high-speed internet service that rivaled Japan?

Related: US Cities In 43 States Vying For Google Fiber

:: This post first appeared at Wiredpen
:: Follow me on Twitter!

Related Posts

• February 1, 2012 -- Google Analytics Adds New Insights (0)
• December 5, 2011 -- Infographic–Google (5)
• July 26, 2011 -- Down On the Farm: Demand Media and Google’s Attempts to Make Search More Valuable (6)
• July 2, 2011 -- +1 Takes on New Meaning With Launch Of Google Plus (4)
• April 27, 2011 -- iPad’s Days on Top of World Are Numbered (6)

I wonder if the money were spent to upgrade the current system to make it cheaper and faster (think South Korea) whether that would be a better way to stimulate new business opportunities, more broadband users, new applications?

Related Posts

• February 27, 2008 -- The Audience is Listening…filming, voting, Flipping. (0)
• June 10, 2009 -- and the most influential person is… (0)
• March 21, 2009 -- “The current (news) meltdown is just a warm up act.” (0)
• March 10, 2009 -- TwitterFall: Twitter on crack, on roller-skates… in a jumpsuit (1)
• January 29, 2009 -- Should The President Keep His “Blackberry”? (0)