Flip the Media
At the crossroads of Media, Culture and Technology

Publishing Industry Responds To Digital Disruption By Delaying eBooks


Posted by Kathy Gill on
Wednesday, December 9th, 2009 at 9:48 am

Because publishing has historically had very high fixed costs (printing presses and distribution warehouses), the industry is threatened by lower-cost digital distribution. Simon & Schuster as well as Lagardere SCA’s Hachette Book Group have announced that they will not publish a ebook until four months after the hardcover, positioning the ebook in-between the hardcover and paperback editions.

Even as the retail price of many new hardcover novels creeps above $27, Amazon and Barnes & Noble boast many new best sellers for only $9.99 in the e-book format.

Increasingly, publishers have come to fear that the bargain prices will lead consumers to conclude that books are worth only $10, or less, upsetting the pricing model that has survived for decades.

[...]

For customers, the e-book savings are striking. Barnes & Noble sells the hardcover edition of Stephen King’s new thriller, “Under the Dome,” for $22.75, but the e-book edition is only $9.99, a 71% discount off the $35 cover price.

Retailers generally pay publishers half the hardcover list price of each book, which means retailers lose money on current best sellers discounted to $9.99 or lower. Some publishers worry that retailers will eventually insist on paying less.

This latest artificially-imposed scarcity is ironic, given that publishers have successfully stymied the growth of the ebook market by removing the property rights associated with owning a printed book: it’s not possible to resell the ebook, it’s not possible to “gift” the ebook after reading it, it’s not possible to share the ebook with family members (except by sharing the reader itself). Some people dub this draconian DRM.

Responding to a tweet, Ian Soboroff notes: “it makes more economic sense to hold back the hardcover edition and release the e-book early. Let e-book sales drive the print run.” I’m guessing that Cory Doctorow and Chris Anderson might say something similar, if they respond to this WSJ article.

The Simon & Schuster business model cannot survive. The firm, owned by CBS, publishes 2,000 titles a year and employs 1,500. This means that on average each book’s revenue has to support not only the author but also one S&S employee’s salary and benefits as well as printing, distribution, promotion, advertising, overhead. It’s a business model that requires “hits” to survive; in 2007, S&S had 140 titles on the NY Times bestseller list.

Publishers have market power over retailers even though that industry is dominated by a handful of firms. This article implies that rewards programs like Barnes and Noble and discounts offered by online retailers like Amazon come at the expense of the retailer’s bottom-line, that the publisher can count on revenue equal to 50 percent of the cover price.

According to Robyn Jackson, a “successful” fiction book sells 5,000 copies; nonfiction, 7,500 copies. Only 1-in-5 American families bought or read a book “last year” and about 3-out-of-4 books published do not earn back the advance given the author.

No wonder the cover price keeps inching upwards.

See a list of the top publishers in the world by 2008 sales (Simon & Schuster is number 26).

Posted via web from Kathy Gill’s posterous

Share this post:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • email
  • RSS
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Related Posts

3 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. I think it’s interesting that S&S’s DRM has been labeled “draconian.” Isn’t music DRM generally the same? I think it would be great to be able to resell ebooks and such, and I’m sure it will happen, but I have a feeling S&S will be able to fight against the market a little longer than the music industry because of the undercurrent in the U.S. that books are somehow superior to ebooks because they are more authentic, and people really seem to be attached to that inky feeling on their fingers.

  2. Sam

    I’m agree with Ian Soboroff when he talks about marketing opportunities of e-books. Actually, it’s easier to control any e-book and access to them when to print books. Books in comparison with music are not so easy to distribute as there is language problem. And the factor of piracy is less threatening when in case of mp3 files.
    I’m wondering that in the future e-reader gadgets become more sophisticated and will be connected back to publisher to gather statistics. Which pages was read more, which graphs or pictures attracted more attention and so on.

  3. A Kindle or any other ebook reader is expensive enough that most users will want to recoup their initial investment by not spending money on regular books, so holding back the e-book release to boost hardcover sales seems unlikely to be effective.

Reply to “Publishing Industry Responds To Digital Disruption By Delaying eBooks”