<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing, an Engine to Help You Make Decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/06/bing-an-engine-to-help-you-make-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/06/bing-an-engine-to-help-you-make-decisions/</link>
	<description>At the crossroads of Media, Culture and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brook Ellingwood</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/06/bing-an-engine-to-help-you-make-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Brook Ellingwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3324#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>Of course, the first test I subjected Bing to was to search for my own name. It returns the same woefully bad results that MSN Live Search always did for the same vanity search. It&#039;s kind of cool that my one IMDB credit from over a decade ago shows up first, but it&#039;s pretty irrelevant, especially in comparison to Google&#039;s results, which start with my LinkedIn profile, then follow with my personal site at http://brookellingwood.com. I made it 7 pages into Bing&#039;s results before giving up on ever finding http://brookellingwood.com at all. Considering that I&#039;ve done a ton of work on making that site discoverable (including linking it twice in this post) that&#039;s pretty strange.

Maybe Bing really does do &quot;decision-y&quot; things better than Google, but unless they also can get the &quot;discover-y&quot; things that people need all the time right, they aren&#039;t going to make much of a dent in the big G&#039;s traffic numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the first test I subjected Bing to was to search for my own name. It returns the same woefully bad results that MSN Live Search always did for the same vanity search. It&#8217;s kind of cool that my one IMDB credit from over a decade ago shows up first, but it&#8217;s pretty irrelevant, especially in comparison to Google&#8217;s results, which start with my LinkedIn profile, then follow with my personal site at <a href="http://brookellingwood.com" rel="nofollow">http://brookellingwood.com</a>. I made it 7 pages into Bing&#8217;s results before giving up on ever finding <a href="http://brookellingwood.com" rel="nofollow">http://brookellingwood.com</a> at all. Considering that I&#8217;ve done a ton of work on making that site discoverable (including linking it twice in this post) that&#8217;s pretty strange.</p>
<p>Maybe Bing really does do &#8220;decision-y&#8221; things better than Google, but unless they also can get the &#8220;discover-y&#8221; things that people need all the time right, they aren&#8217;t going to make much of a dent in the big G&#8217;s traffic numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

