<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter on the auction block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/04/twitter-on-the-auction-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/04/twitter-on-the-auction-block/</link>
	<description>At the crossroads of Media, Culture and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: traceycheng</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/04/twitter-on-the-auction-block/comment-page-1/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>traceycheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3027#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>Mark,

As much as any other search &#039;engine&#039; right now.. I only see twitter being convenient but not necessarily factual as a search tool.. afterall there is no way to regulate the information..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>As much as any other search &#8216;engine&#8217; right now.. I only see twitter being convenient but not necessarily factual as a search tool.. afterall there is no way to regulate the information..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crackerbelly</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/04/twitter-on-the-auction-block/comment-page-1/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator>crackerbelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3027#comment-3366</guid>
		<description>Ivan,

Nice point on YouTube. I hadn&#039;t thought about them. It does appear that they are in the minority however.

Sean,

I suppose Twitter has some potential as an &quot;e-mail light&quot; but I really see their influence in the area of search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan,</p>
<p>Nice point on YouTube. I hadn&#8217;t thought about them. It does appear that they are in the minority however.</p>
<p>Sean,</p>
<p>I suppose Twitter has some potential as an &#8220;e-mail light&#8221; but I really see their influence in the area of search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivsyd</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/04/twitter-on-the-auction-block/comment-page-1/#comment-3364</link>
		<dc:creator>ivsyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3027#comment-3364</guid>
		<description>Sean,

Google bought YouTube a couple years ago. And this fact didn&#039;t damage YouTube&#039;s popularity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>Google bought YouTube a couple years ago. And this fact didn&#8217;t damage YouTube&#8217;s popularity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanwang</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/04/twitter-on-the-auction-block/comment-page-1/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>seanwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3027#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>The success of Twitter is largely due to its &quot;utility&quot; like funtion. So any attempt to alter it for the benefit of its new &quot;owner&quot; will undoubtedly damage it. However, it&#039;s clearly not viable for Twitter to continue to survive on the infrastructure of one startup.

I think the best future for Twitter is to evolve into an &quot;email like&quot; utility. That is a system of many systems, capable of working as one through standards and protocols, but residing on many seperate infrastructures much like the way email does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The success of Twitter is largely due to its &#8220;utility&#8221; like funtion. So any attempt to alter it for the benefit of its new &#8220;owner&#8221; will undoubtedly damage it. However, it&#8217;s clearly not viable for Twitter to continue to survive on the infrastructure of one startup.</p>
<p>I think the best future for Twitter is to evolve into an &#8220;email like&#8221; utility. That is a system of many systems, capable of working as one through standards and protocols, but residing on many seperate infrastructures much like the way email does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

